RIDE GEAR GUIDE / TOWING & HITCHES

Equal-i-zer vs CURT TruTrack

Both offer integrated weight distribution and sway resistance, but their hitch-head mechanisms, model families, and setup tradeoffs are not identical.

Compare Current Options
BUYER’S GUIDEHEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISONMODEL-SPECIFIC RATINGS

The names sound similar because both systems use weight-distribution spring bars and integrated sway resistance. But calling them identical “four-point friction hitches” hides a useful engineering difference: Equal-i-zer relies on friction at its head sockets and L-brackets, while CURT describes the TruTrack 4P as a spring-and-cam head system plus bracket friction. This comparison starts with that distinction, then works through ratings, setup, and real ownership.

As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

01 Quick picks by system and rating

These are five documented configurations from three distinct control arrangements—not five independent hitch technologies. Compare models only after measuring loaded tongue weight.

Traditional four-point frictionEqual-i-zer Original 4-Point — 10K

The L-bracket interfaces and hitch-head sockets both contribute friction. This differs from CURT’s cam-assisted 4P head.

Control4-point: head sockets + L-bracketsRating10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW model
Cam-assisted 4-point alternativeCURT TruTrack 4P — 17500

CURT describes hardened cam elements in the head plus friction at fixed spring-bar support brackets.

Control4-point: spring/cam head + fixed bracketsRating10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW model
Higher-rated Equal-i-zer optionEqual-i-zer Original 4-Point — 12K

Same basic friction-control family, but a different spring-arm and head rating must be selected as a matched system.

Control4-point: head sockets + L-bracketsRating12,000 lb GTW / 1,200 lb TW model
Higher-rated CURT 4PCURT TruTrack 4P — 17501

CURT publishes both a tongue-weight operating range and 15K upper gross trailer weight rating for this part.

Control4-point: spring/cam head + fixed bracketsRating10,000–15,000 lb GTW / 1,000–1,500 lb TW
Different CURT system; not a 4P equivalentCURT TruTrack 2P — 17601

The 2P relies on two fixed bracket friction points; CURT explicitly says it does not use the 4P spring-and-cam head.

Control2-point: bracket friction onlyRatingUp to 10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW

02 Equal-i-zer vs TruTrack comparison table

Ratings are model-specific manufacturer listings, not towing permissions. Always follow the lowest-rated component and the vehicle manufacturer’s weight-distribution guidance.

ConfigurationSway-control mechanismPublished weight classKey tradeoff
Equal-i-zer Original 4-Point — 10K4-point: head sockets + L-brackets10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW modelFrame bracket position, turning noise, and head-socket lubrication are part of ownership.
CURT TruTrack 4P — 175004-point: spring/cam head + fixed brackets10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW modelDo not assume head maintenance, bracket geometry, or replacement parts are interchangeable with Equal-i-zer.
Equal-i-zer Original 4-Point — 12K4-point: head sockets + L-brackets12,000 lb GTW / 1,200 lb TW modelA higher label rating does not increase the tow vehicle, receiver, or trailer limits; oversized bars may be a poor match.
CURT TruTrack 4P — 175014-point: spring/cam head + fixed brackets10,000–15,000 lb GTW / 1,000–1,500 lb TWAt 1,000 lb TW minimum, it is not an automatic choice for lighter trailers.
CURT TruTrack 2P — 176012-point: bracket friction onlyUp to 10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TWDo not mistake the 2P for a direct four-point competitor or assume equal sway-control behavior.

03 Detailed model comparison

Use the correct rating and full kit configuration; a model number, shank inclusion, and trailer-ball inclusion can change what is actually in the box.

01 / Traditional four-point friction

Equal-i-zer Original 4-Point — 10K

4-point: head sockets + L-brackets10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW modelConfirm complete kit

For owners seeking Equal-i-zer’s established four-friction-contact architecture at a common trailer-weight class.

What stands out: The L-bracket interfaces and hitch-head sockets both contribute friction. This differs from CURT’s cam-assisted 4P head.

Who it suits: For owners seeking Equal-i-zer’s established four-friction-contact architecture at a common trailer-weight class.

Why choose itEstablished integrated friction arrangement; clear manufacturer maintenance documentation.
Why skip itFrame bracket position, turning noise, and head-socket lubrication are part of ownership.

Ownership tradeoff: Grease the head socket friction surfaces as the manufacturer directs; do not grease the L-bracket contact surfaces as a casual noise fix.

Check Price
02 / Cam-assisted 4-point alternative

CURT TruTrack 4P — 17500

4-point: spring/cam head + fixed brackets10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TW modelConfirm complete kit

For a comparable nominal weight class when buyers prefer CURT’s spring-and-cam head design.

What stands out: CURT describes hardened cam elements in the head plus friction at fixed spring-bar support brackets.

Who it suits: For a comparable nominal weight class when buyers prefer CURT’s spring-and-cam head design.

Why choose itDifferent head mechanism from Equal-i-zer, with integrated four-point sway resistance.
Why skip itDo not assume head maintenance, bracket geometry, or replacement parts are interchangeable with Equal-i-zer.

Ownership tradeoff: Use the CURT 17500 instructions for lubrication, adjustment, and frame bracket positioning; do not copy Equal-i-zer procedures.

Check Price
03 / Higher-rated Equal-i-zer option

Equal-i-zer Original 4-Point — 12K

4-point: head sockets + L-brackets12,000 lb GTW / 1,200 lb TW modelConfirm complete kit

For measured loaded tongue weights that warrant the 12K class rather than an undersized 10K model.

What stands out: Same basic friction-control family, but a different spring-arm and head rating must be selected as a matched system.

Who it suits: For measured loaded tongue weights that warrant the 12K class rather than an undersized 10K model.

Why choose itA higher-rated option without changing the basic Equal-i-zer operating concept.
Why skip itA higher label rating does not increase the tow vehicle, receiver, or trailer limits; oversized bars may be a poor match.

Ownership tradeoff: Select a matched manufacturer-rated assembly using actual loaded tongue weight, not dry brochure weight.

Check Price
04 / Higher-rated CURT 4P

CURT TruTrack 4P — 17501

4-point: spring/cam head + fixed brackets10,000–15,000 lb GTW / 1,000–1,500 lb TWConfirm complete kit

For heavier applications whose loaded tongue weight falls within CURT’s specified range and whose tow vehicle permits weight distribution.

What stands out: CURT publishes both a tongue-weight operating range and 15K upper gross trailer weight rating for this part.

Who it suits: For heavier applications whose loaded tongue weight falls within CURT’s specified range and whose tow vehicle permits weight distribution.

Why choose itClear manufacturer part-number specification and integrated four-point control.
Why skip itAt 1,000 lb TW minimum, it is not an automatic choice for lighter trailers.

Ownership tradeoff: Confirm loaded tongue weight falls within the listed range; verify the ball, shank, receiver and vehicle limits.

Check Price
05 / Different CURT system; not a 4P equivalent

CURT TruTrack 2P — 17601

2-point: bracket friction onlyUp to 10,000 lb GTW / 1,000 lb TWConfirm complete kit

For buyers comparing the TruTrack name who need to understand that 2P and 4P are different systems.

What stands out: The 2P relies on two fixed bracket friction points; CURT explicitly says it does not use the 4P spring-and-cam head.

Who it suits: For buyers comparing the TruTrack name who need to understand that 2P and 4P are different systems.

Why choose itPotentially simpler architecture and a separate price class to compare.
Why skip itDo not mistake the 2P for a direct four-point competitor or assume equal sway-control behavior.

Ownership tradeoff: Read the exact SKU description before ordering; TruTrack branding alone does not establish the mechanism.

Check Price

04 Which mechanism should you choose?

Choose by hitch-head design, not the number “four” alone

Equal-i-zer: the spring bars interact with L-brackets on the trailer frame and sockets in the hitch head. Manufacturer maintenance instructions specifically call for lubricating the socket-to-head friction surfaces; the L-bracket surfaces are not routinely greased. This is a defined ownership routine, not a claim that one hitch never makes noise.

TruTrack 4P: CURT describes a spring-and-cam system at the head, with fixed support brackets providing additional lateral resistance. Its design is mechanically distinct, and its instructions should control setup and lubrication. Do not transfer Equal-i-zer washer settings or lubrication habits to CURT.

TruTrack 2P: CURT describes bracket friction without the 4P head cam. It can be a valid choice in its own right, but a 2P listing should never be silently compared as though it were the same 4P system.

Three real-world scenarios

  1. You tow a conventional travel trailer and value documented friction maintenance: shortlist the appropriately rated Equal-i-zer, then confirm frame clearance and fit.
  2. You want a different four-point head mechanism: compare the same weight class against CURT TruTrack 4P; check bracket mounting space and the exact CURT installation sheet.
  3. You see a cheaper TruTrack listing: inspect the model number before deciding; it might be a 2P rather than the 4P system you intended to compare.

05 Five checks before buying either hitch

  1. Weigh the loaded trailer: use actual loaded tongue weight, including any weight behind the tow vehicle’s rear axle that the hitch maker directs you to include; do not size from dry tongue weight alone.
  2. Check the complete tow rating chain: tow vehicle, receiver (including its weight-distribution rating), ball, shank, coupler, trailer, and hitch. The lowest applicable limit controls.
  3. Confirm the tow vehicle permits weight distribution: some vehicles or receivers restrict it; never assume a higher-rated hitch upgrades the vehicle.
  4. Inspect trailer A-frame clearance: propane trays, battery boxes, jack hardware and frame geometry can obstruct bracket locations.
  5. Follow the exact manual for setup and maintenance: initial adjustment, head tilt, bracket height, torque, lubrication and rechecks vary by brand and model. A hitch cannot compensate for poor loading, worn tires or unsafe driving in crosswinds.

Important: sway control reduces unwanted yaw; it does not make a trailer immune to sway or override safe speed, loading, tire pressure, or towing limits.

06Frequently asked questions

Are Equal-i-zer and CURT TruTrack 4P the same four-point system?

No. Both have four sway-control contact locations, but Equal-i-zer documents socket friction at the head, while CURT describes a spring-and-cam head plus fixed bracket friction in its 4P.

Is every CURT TruTrack a four-point hitch?

No. CURT also sells TruTrack 2P models, which use two bracket friction points and omit the 4P cam system. Check the part number.

Can I use the same spring bars with different rated hitch heads?

Do not assume so. Equal-i-zer documents that spring arms must match the head rating; always use manufacturer-approved matched components.

Should I grease the Equal-i-zer L-brackets to stop noise?

Follow the current Equal-i-zer maintenance guidance. It calls for grease on head socket contact surfaces and says routine grease on L-brackets or spring bars is not necessary. Do not improvise friction-surface lubrication.

Does a 15K weight-distribution hitch let me tow 15,000 pounds?

No. The tow vehicle, receiver, hitch hardware, coupler, trailer and applicable tongue-weight limits all remain controlling; the hitch label alone cannot raise them.

07 Bottom line

Compare Equal-i-zer 4-Point against CURT TruTrack 4P at an appropriate loaded tongue-weight class, then choose between their different head mechanisms and maintenance routines. Verify the CURT model is actually 4P, confirm the full kit contents, and fit the trailer before treating either system as the winner.

Scroll to Top